As part of the Tyndale Bloggers Network I will occasionally review books provided to me by the publisher.
My father-in-law passed away recently. While in Michigan for his funeral, I
brought the new book by R.C. Sroul Jr., The Call To Wonder. When my sister-in-law saw the book on
the end table, she mentioned that Sproul’s wife had just passed away and that
she had been reading his blog posts (you can find his blog here).
This brought perspective to my reading. As an author he wrote about loving God like a child. Now as a widower that childlike
relationship with God is severely tested.
As he wrote the book, he was comforting his wife in her struggle through
cancer treatment. As I read the
book, he was grieving the loss of his wife to that cancer. Stethoscope to his chest, I can hear
his heart through these words bound in this small book.
The book focuses on children as a model. Sproul considers their trust, their
wonder, and their desire to please as parallels between the innocence of
children and our approach to God.
He does so by using examples from his own children. These are wonderful parables, stories
of children that are personal, intimate, and real. At times these are tender
stories. His chapter on his
special needs daughter, Shannon, aka Princess Happy, is particularly touching
(chapter 6, “the Call To Joy). Her fascination with balloons and her “love
affair with sunbeams” (p. 144) are examples of how “Shannon lives in a constant
state of wonder because she receives the grace and beauty of God for what they
are and sees them wherever they are – which is everywhere” (p.143). This tenderness gives way to
conviction. His suggestion that
his children are his spiritual betters (p.23) may mistake the model for the
reality, but the model is an effective mirror. I can see the deficiencies of my faith in the ways of
children.
So Sproul calls me to treat God as “completely and utterly
trustworthy” (p.46); to take in the universe “as a child takes in a fireworks
show” (p.61); to resist the temptation to tame the God of surprises (p.4); and
to ardently desire to please God as a child longs to please his father (p.86).
These are hard principles, even in the placid seas of familiar routine - how
much more in his wild torrent of spousal death. And yet, if his blog posts are any indication, he is
seeking to practice what he preaches.
But as a book critic, I cannot not merely listen to his
heart. At some point I must set
aside the stethoscope and pick up the scalpel. The book is built on Mathew
18:3, where Jesus says, “Unless you change and become as little children, you
will never enter the kingdom of heaven” (NIV). When Jesus tells us that we must become like children, he is
using a simile, a form of comparison using the words “like” or “as.” The simile has meaning in as much as we
understand the connection between the two things being compared.
If I use snow as the object of a simile, that may be because
snow is white, or cold, or impermanent. I may be referring to any of those
attributes - it is unlikely I am referring to all of them. The simile cannot mean whatever we
please. Context will help
determine which of these referents I have in mind.
When Jesus calls us to be like children it is within a
discussion of who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. In verse 4 he clarifies his
intent. “Therefore, whoever
humbles himself like this child is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.” The key to greatness is humility. A child is a picture of that. We should show the same dependence. Nothing in my hand I bring. Simply to the cross I cling. The
chapter on “The Call To Trust” has its finger on this. Other chapters, like the Call to
Wonder, the Call to Please, The Call To Joy are interesting, but not outgrowths
of Jesus’ call to be like a child.
None of these are hinted at by the simile.
This isn’t heretical, but it does seem sloppy, particularly
as he uses his tendency toward deep theological reflection as a contrast to his
children’s model of faith. Like
writing a note about how wonderful my handwriting is, in a scribble that is
barely legible, there is deep irony in ribbing himself for being ”quite the
theologically sound fellow” (p.136) and then carelessly interpreting his key
text.
Still, this is a worthwhile read. Even if the lessons learned can’t be hung on the passage he
relies on, they remain valuable lessons. Some are lessons I need.
Most helpful for me was his suggestion that we feel loss most
profoundly when it is in contrast to previous blessing (pages 169-172). I miss my father-in-law because
he was such a blessing to have had in my life. So rather than be embittered by the loss, I should be
grateful for the blessing. To get
bogged down in “why, God?” is to miss out on “Thank you, Lord” ( I comment more on this lesson in my previous post "Entitlement").
To get hung up on one deficiency would be to miss this and
other valuable lessons offered in this book. There is a place for a scalpel in your reading. But in this case, make sure to rely most
heavily on the stethoscope.
If you've enjoyed this post, consider subscribing by e-mail. If you think others would benefit, share it with them.